Differences between revisions 11 and 29 (spanning 18 versions)
Revision 11 as of 2006-02-01 22:21:27
Size: 1200
Comment:
Revision 29 as of 2007-01-25 23:34:32
Size: 1799
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
#acl All:read,write
Line 3: Line 5:
This is my effort to create a unionfs implementation which is probably slower but way more flexible than the current in-kernel unionfs solution. Currently it's almost fully usable, the only problem is new file/directory creation which I will fix soon... This is my effort to create a unionfs filesystem implementation which is probably slower but way more flexible than the current in-kernel unionfs solution. Currently it's almost fully usable, will only minor convenience issues to be fixed...
Line 5: Line 7:
I'm open to patches, suggestions, whatever... I'm open to patches, suggestions, whatever (at radek@podgorny.cz)...

[[GoogleAd()]]
Line 17: Line 21:
== Available parameters == == Usage ==
Line 19: Line 23:
 * {{{--roots=/root1,/root2}}}
 * {{{--stats}}}
{{{
unionfs [options] root[:root...] mountpoint
The first argument is a colon separated list of directories to merge

general options:
    -o opt,[opt...] mount options
    -h --help print help
    -V --version print version

UnionFS options:
    -o stats show statistics in the file 'stats' under the mountpoint
}}}
Line 24: Line 38:
 * Add support for creating directories
Line 29: Line 42:
[[GoogleAd()]]

== Donation ==

If you use the software and like it, please consider a donation (provided by Pay''''''Pal)...

[[PayPalDonation()]]
Line 31: Line 52:
 * Latest version: 0.10 (released 2006-02-01)  * Latest version: 0.16 (released 2007-01-26)
Line 33: Line 54:

If you want to follow the development closely, see my mercurial repository at:

 * http://hg.podgorny.cz/unionfs-fuse

Foreword

This is my effort to create a unionfs filesystem implementation which is probably slower but way more flexible than the current in-kernel unionfs solution. Currently it's almost fully usable, will only minor convenience issues to be fixed...

I'm open to patches, suggestions, whatever (at radek@podgorny.cz)...

GoogleAd()

Why choose this stuff

  • The filesystem has to be mounted after the roots are mounted when using the standard module. With unionfs-fuse, you can mount the roots later and their contents will appear seamlesly
  • You get caching which speeds things up a lot for free
  • You get nice stats (optional)

Why NOT choose it

  • Compared to kernel-space solution we need lots of useless context switches which makes kernel-only solution clear speed-winner

Usage

unionfs [options] root[:root...] mountpoint
The first argument is a colon separated list of directories to merge

general options:
    -o opt,[opt...]        mount options
    -h   --help            print help
    -V   --version         print version

UnionFS options:
    -o stats               show statistics in the file 'stats' under the mountpoint

TODO

  • Add support for choice which roots are read-only and which are not
  • Add cache controls
  • Handle writing to /stats intelligently

GoogleAd()

Donation

If you use the software and like it, please consider a donation (provided by PayPal)...

PayPalDonation()

Download

If you want to follow the development closely, see my mercurial repository at: